Turgenev, Ivan

Review of Fathers and Sons by Ivan Turgenev

97801414413371Here is what Goodreads has to say about Fathers and Sons by Ivan Turgenev:  “Bazarov—a gifted, impatient, and caustic young man—has journeyed from school to the home of his friend Arkady Kirsanov. But soon Bazarov’s outspoken rejection of authority and social conventions touches off quarrels, misunderstandings, and romantic entanglements that will utterly transform the Kirsanov household and reflect the changes taking place all across nineteenth-century Russia.”

I bought this book for a dollar at the local used bookstore, and this is one of the best books I’ve read this year. It is a fantastic character study. Bazarov’s nihilism is perceived at once as a threat to the Russian traditions of the older generation and as a curiosity to Bazarov’s own generation. But, this novel is not really a study of nihilism. We never know whether the author agrees or disagrees with this philosophy. True, nihilism is discussed by nearly every character in the book, but the novel’s central theme is Bazarov’s influence on others. This young doctor cannot be ignored.

For most of the story, I did not like Bazarov. He is selfish and views humans as nothing more than a conglomeration of organs. He rejects sentiments, art, and love. In short, he does not give credence to anything that cannot be empirically proven. But Bazarov has some enviable characteristics. Because he rejects everything, he also rejects systems of oppression such as the Russian system of master and serf. Instead of keeping his distance from Nicholas Petrovich Kirsanov’s peasant mistress Fenichka, he frequently and freely offers health services to her son Mitya.

What makes Fathers and Sons so unique is that none of the characters in the book are purely lovable or purely despicable. There is a good and a bad side to every character. Even those who reject Bazarov’s philosophy are not fully in the right. Although the novel is only a little less than 200 pages, you really come to know and understand each and every character. The story is less about the message and more about the journey. Arcady’s individual growth stems from the tension that exists between Bazarov and the older generation and Bazarov and his love, Anna Sergeyevna. Even Bazarov has to wrestle with the demands of his own philosophy.

If you like character studies, you will really enjoy Fathers and Sons.

5 thoughts on “Review of Fathers and Sons by Ivan Turgenev”

  1. I was so glad to hear you gave it a glowing review because I have it slated to read later in the year. I love Russian novels. I’m reading The Idiot by Dostoyevsky at the moment and it’s already setting up to be a winner.

  2. I discovered your blog on the members’ introduction page of the Classics Club, and I’m glad I did! 🙂

    I absolutely agree with your thoughts on the novel, especially on the point that this story has no clear hero/anti-hero thing going on. I’m currently reading “Anna Karenina”, and I feel this also.

    And how are you liking “Mrs. Dalloway”? 🙂

    1. Thank you for these kind words 🙂 I have been wanting to read Anna Karenina for quite a while. I really like a good character study. I just finished rereading Mrs. Dalloway and I loved it. It is not as challenging a read as it seems. We all jump from thought to thought.

      I loved entering the heads of each and every character. Does knowing someone else’s background/inner struggles help one know that person better?

      1. So glad you liked “Mrs. Dalloway” 🙂 Virginia Woolf writes in a style which resembles thought-process: fluid ideas, run-on sentences…

        And yes, I feel it would.

  3. Oh, I just read this too! I loved it, but I didn’t write a proper review/blog post at all. I didn’t find Bazarov very likable, but I did feel sorry for him. Aren’t young men *supposed* to be annoyingly certain about their bizarre opinions that would never work in real life? 🙂 I think I knew a few too many Bazarovs myself to really dislike him all that much; I keep thinking that he’ll grow up a bit and learn. Maybe he wouldn’t have.

    The Russian far Left’s idea that Bazarov preaches– that it was their job to destroy society to clear the ground for some undefined new and wonderful arrangement was (is) a truly awful one, though. I cannot understand why they thought it would be a good plan.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s